![]() |
||||||
|
|
|
|||||
|
Natural Gas |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Freedom from Russia Europe has become dependent on Russia for much of
its natural gas. Russia supplied about 33% of EU’s natural gas in 2007. On at least two occasions, Russia has cut off the
supply of natural gas to European nations. The gas cut-offs left
hundreds of thousands of Europeans shivering in the cold. Russia has done all it could to prevent the building of alternative pipelines that could supply Europe with natural gas from sources outside Russia. The recent emergence of natural gas from shale could
change Europe’s dependence on Russia for natural gas. Exxon’s new discovery of a huge natural gas field
from shale in Canada has made the headlines. Earlier discoveries by
other energy companies of natural gas from the Barnet and Haynesville
shale fields have suddenly created a glut of natural gas in the United
States. Little mention has been made that Exxon and others
are exploring for natural gas from shale in Europe.
Exxon is accumulating leases in shale formations in Germany, Hungary and
Poland. “Tests on two wells in Hungary, where Exxon and its partners
hold leases on 400,000 acres, are expected this year. It will be the
first time the shale there has been tested.”
Exxon also holds 750,000 acres in northern Germany and plans to sink 10
wells to investigate the potential for natural gas production there. "There's a possibility that under our feet are the
same kind of shale-gas deposits that you have in the United States,"
said Brian Horsfield, a professor of organic geochemistry at the GFZ
German Research Center for Geosciences in Potsdam, Germany. "There are
many of the same types of shale formations in Europe." While it will take several years to develop natural
gas from shale in Europe, it represents the first possibility that
Europe can achieve freedom from Russia. Another alternative, the Nabucco pipeline traversing
Turkey and several eastern European countries, was given a breath of
life when the governments of these countries signed an agreement
allowing the pipeline to pass through all their countries. The Nabucco
venture has one problem; it still does not have a source of natural gas,
and without a confirmed source it will be difficult to get the financing
(approximately $8 Billion) for the project.. There is a danger that environmentalists will
challenge the practice of fracturing which is needed to release the gas
from the shale. In 2005 the EPA said fracturing was safe, but
environmentalists are now challenging that assertion. Sources: The Heritage Foundation. The Wall Street
Journal. The New York Times. TSAugust August 12, 2009
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Gas to liquids |
||||||
|
Shell Oil Company has recently run an advertisement
featuring their efforts to produce liquid fuels from natural gas. The
process is known as Gas to Liquids (GTL) and produces a diesel fuel. The inference, though not stated, was that GTL would
be suitable for use in the United States.
GTL was an outgrowth of Coal to Liquids (CTL) originally developed by
Germany and subsequently used by South Africa when their Apartheid
policies caused the world to cut off South Africa’s oil supplies.
South Africa turned to the Fischer-Tropsch, CTL process to produce a
liquid fuel from South Africa’s vast supply of coal. (Coal is cooked in
steam to produce syngas that is then processed in much the same way as
natural gas.) More recently the process has been used to convert
natural gas to liquid fuels, first in Malaysia then in the Middle East,
primarily in Qatar. The GTL process was suitable for these locations
because the natural gas at these locations was stranded, that is,
couldn’t be easily transported by pipeline to countries that could use
the natural gas. The process is very expensive and loses considerable
heat energy when the natural gas is converted to a liquid. Royal Dutch Shell is building a 0.14 Million Barrels
per day GTL complex in Qatar at a cost of $18 billion. This cost is
higher than other proposed GTL plants due to having to build a pipelines
from the natural gas field to the GTL plant. Proposals for GTL plants
outside the Middle East cost about half this much. Qatar’s gas is
essentially free, while natural gas elsewhere is costly. The main attraction for GTL outside the Middle East
is that the fuel burns more cleanly than diesel or gasoline. The fuel
has a higher cetane rating than commercial diesel fuel. While GTL makes great economic sense where there is
stranded natural gas, GTL is a poor choice elsewhere. GTL is inefficient in that it loses energy when
converting natural gas to a diesel fuel. Natural gas is a valuable
resource needed to heat homes and for use by industry. If we were to use natural gas as a transportation
fuel, it would make far greater sense to use it directly by building
natural gas cars and a natural gas delivery infrastructure. GTL is one of several alternatives in the energy mix
and it’s important that we get the mix right, and make the most
effective use of our energy resources. TSAugust
December 14, 2008 |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
| To Top of Page | ||||||
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 TSAugust |
||||||